New York Knicks: Revisiting the tanking question
The Biggest Losers
It’s easy to avoid these questions by just focusing on the successes. What we don’t often pay attention to are the other stories…the ones of teams who have “institutionalized losing,” as Knicks’ GM Scott Perry recently referred to tanking, and haven’t lived to tell the tale.
Let’s start with only team from the last two decades with a worse net rating than the one Chicago entered that Knicks game with: the 2011-12 Charlotte Bobcats.
You remember that Bobcats team, right? No? You should. They were way, way ahead of their time. Sure, teams had “tanked” before, but never like this. They knew full well that Anthony Davis was the pot of gold awaiting them at the end of the rainbow, and they rode a sled of bricks down that rainbow right into the toilet.
(As an aside, Charlotte had a 48 true shooting percentage to go with their 7-59 record for the year. To put that into context, of the 110 players in the league this season taking at least 10 shots per game, only 5 are worse that what that Bobcat team collectively achieved, and four are rookie guards. Paul Silas should have gotten a medal for making it through that season. Shockingly, he has not been hired since. Nothing sticks to your clothes quite like the stench of old Bobcat pee.)
What did the Charlotte franchise get for their troubles?
Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, of course. They followed that up with Cody Zellar, and then took Noah Vonleh and Frank Kaminsky in the two years after that. Four seasons, four top ten picks – including two in the top four – and zero guys who could start for a contender.
That’s just one example, but team after team, pick after pick, we’ve accumulated ample evidence that under normal circumstances, the more often you pick near the top of the draft, the worse off you’ll be.